|September 19, 2003
SOUTH AFRICA: Arms deal plunges South Africa into Its worst post-Apartheid crisis
An arms deal worth about 3.9 billion U.S. dollars concluded between South Africa and several European multinationals has plunged South Africa into its worst post-apartheid political crisis.
On Thursday, September 18, President Thabo Mbeki announced a judicial commission of inquiry into allegations that the chief investigator of alleged corruption in the course of the deal, Bulelani Ngcuka, was an apartheid spy. Ngcuka is the head of the country's national prosecuting authority and together with his team, has kept up a feisty investigation into the arms deal. Among others, he is investigating deputy president Jacob Zuma for allegedly requesting a bribe from Thales, the French defence company.
But a fortnight ago, the hunter became the hunted when allegations surfaced in news report that he had been the spy. An article in the South Africa's City Press suggested that he was getting his back at senior figures in the ruling African National Congress (ANC) who had investigated him in the 1980s. The degree of infiltration of the ANC by apartheid agents was high in the struggle against apartheid.
But apart from the political heat, questions are being raised about the benefits government claimed would flow from the arms deal. South Africa has entered into so-called counter-trade agreements with the arms companies where they would provide investment in return for the purchases.
South Africa paid 3.9 billion U.S. dollars for four corvettes from the German Frigate Consortiums; three submarines from Ferrostaal; 28 Gripen fighters from BAE/SAAB, 24 Hawk jet trainers from BAE and 25 light utility helicopters from Agusta. In return, it signed off-set contracts valued at 16.6 billion U.S. dollars. Direct industrial participation (DIP) in the defence industry by winning bidders makes up 2.4 billion U.S. dollars, while indirect participation in the rest of economy comprises the rest. The latter benefits are called national industrial participation (NIP).
Critics say that it will be very difficult for South Africa to pluck the promised fruits as off-set deals around the world often fizzle out. But Researcher David Botha of the Institute for Strategic Studies found that government's clients had by the end of March met over a quarter (26.5 percent) of their commitments to the defence industry, valued at R3.7 billion (around 507 million U.S. dollars). Orders have been placed with 38 local companies, and the estimated work content of the contracts placed is 3.6-million man-hours, or an estimated 1677 jobs, says Botha.
While the first part of the off-sets have been achieved quite quickly, says Botha, the rest of the contracts are likely to come more slowly. Information on the NIPs for example, the more substantial and difficult part of the off-set package, is far more sketchy in Botha's research and in government's monitoring. Government's team had approved 45 projects by the end of Mar. 2003 but not many have moved beyond the drawing board and benefits are still only in the projections phase. These projects are expected to generate credits to the value of 6 billion U.S. dollars over between seven and 11 years. Thus over 40 percent of the total commitment of 14 billion U.S. dollars has already been approved after only three years, says Botha.
Big projects collated in the research include: a solar panel manufacturing plant in the Western Cape with projected revenues of 20 million U.S. dollars a year; Filk Gold Chains in Cape Town with revenue of about 26 million U.S. dollars a year and which employs 50 people; assistance with agricultural and floricultural exports in the Western Cape have created 1,500 jobs. But researchers are still divided on whether these investments are additional or would have happened with our without the arms deal. A beneficiation project with Harmony gold mine in the Free State is projected to raise 37 million U.S. dollars in jewelry sales by April next year.
But as some examples of projects already failed show, the road between projections and realisation is long. South Africa's Professor Paul Dunne in a forthcoming book argues that the projected figure of 65,000 jobs from the arms deal is ambitious and that international research shows that downstream employment creation is in fact limited. The key weakness in the offset programme is the absence of independent monitoring and detailed accounting of offsets. Neither Botha's research nor the government have provided details of how off-set credits are calculated. Watch-dogs like the Trade and Industry committee at parliament do not have the capacity to properly audit the claims, while the Auditor-General Shauket Fakie who had undertaken to monitor the process will only do so when the first milestone for offset fulfillment falls due, which is only next year.
For now, the political and other costs of the arms deal seem to out-number the benefits for South Africa. (IPS)